Theatre is Territory

Archive for December, 2007

The Montreal Interviews: Andrew Shaver

Monday, December 31st, 2007

While our “10 questions” interview series is on its year-end hiatus, we are pleased to present a short interview series by Praxis Theatre Associate Artist Greta Papageorgiu: The Montreal Interviews. Enjoy!

1) What does Montreal mean to you?
All the greatness of New York and Paris minus the idiots and sharp elbows.

2) Do you feel that SaBooge Theatre is currently living up to the spirit of its mission statement?
That’s a day-to-day query. Today; sure do.

3) You’ve studied clown in Paris at Lecoq as well as with Fusetti in Italy. Are French clowns different from Italian clowns?
The French clowns must be left to simmer for a minimum of 90 minutes while the Italians can be eaten straight off the vine.

4) How does your clown training inform your approach to acting?
It created a capacity for failure and a desire to really, actually play.

5) Having had the opportunity to tour a few of your shows, what is the strangest or funniest thing that has happened to the company or one of your shows along the way?
Having the American authorities confiscate rice-filled juggling balls at the Minnesota border.

6) What would you say to someone who told you “theatre is dead”?
What a shame; my buddies have a show coming up.

7) What would you like to see more of in Canadian theatre?
The undead.

8) Your production of
The Dishwashers (Sidemart Theatrical Grocery Production) took place in the basement of a bar. How did the location affect the production?
It made every difference. I had no intentions of doing it elsewhere; the show belongs in the basement of a restaurant. Even if the economics of a 25-seat house boggle the mind.

9) What’s next for SaBooge?
Babies.

10) If you had a $100,000 no-strings-attached production budget, what would you do with it?
Produce the show in Rio. Then make the movie. In Helsinki.

Top 10 Toronto theatre artists

Saturday, December 29th, 2007

Now Magazine has released its picks for top Toronto theatre artists of 2007. Included on the list are Brendan Gall, Tara Beagan, Jacob Zimmer (via Small Wooden Shoe), and Hannah Moscovitch. Click here for the full list and write-up.

Congratulations to all these wonderful local artists!

Also in this week’s issue of Now Magazine, theatre critics Glenn Sumi and Jon Kaplan pick their top-10 productions of 2007. Check it out here.

The Montreal Interviews: Paul Hopkins

Monday, December 24th, 2007

While our “10 questions” interview series is on its year-end hiatus, we are pleased to present a short interview series by Praxis Theatre Associate Artist Greta Papageorgiu: The Montreal Interviews. Enjoy!

1) What does Montreal mean to you?
I think Montreal is the soul of Canada, the home and example of the original accommodation between two cultures, that laid the frame work for the Canadian experiment. Today, Montreal, is a living testimony to that experiment – it doesn’t always seem like it’s working but it definitely creates an energy that is vibrant and resonates through the rest of Canada.

For me, personally, it’s the place I call home no matter where I happen to be working.

2)As the recently appointed Artistic Director of Repercussion Theatre in Montreal, where would you like to see the company go under your direction?
I’d like to evolve Repercussion Theater into a centre for classical theatre in Montreal; a place for people who love the classics. From that centre, we will continue to do what we do, producing classical theatre in the park various parks, but also finding ways to reach other communities besides the obvious geographic ones; exploring the a new reality to our modern sense of community.

3) What would you tell a kid who said, “Shakespeare is boring”?
I would agree with him, if his only experience with it was in a classroom environment where he is made to read and study it by himself and then write essays about the themes, plot, etc., for which he will be tested and judged. His plays were written to be. The truest form of a Shakespeare play is created in one’s imagination when it is spoken by people who know how to act it and heard amongst a crowd of people. At the same time we should be grateful that the school system keeps his work alive and that there are many teachers out there who really know how to bring his work to life and peaks the interests of certain student.

4) What are the challenges of putting on a traveling outdoor production?
The cost and maintaining people’s attention. We travel, set up and take down our stages everyday. Transporting a show that can been seen by a potential crowd of 1,200 people outdoors is expensive. Arranging the park space and dealing with different presenters at individual parks also requires a lot of administration.

Artistically, I guess it’s like acting on stage with an animal. The park, the background to your stage, is alive. To work with that environment and still maintain the focus necessary for the work is the key to success. Fortunately, the plays we produce were originally performed with similar distractions and are often set in a forest, field or some Italian piazza

5) What can we do to increase audience sizes in the theatre?
I don’t know. Perhaps by letting people into the process of making a piece of theatre so that they love it as much as the people doing it do. Fundraisers that use lawyers as actors draws a lot of attention. Ad agencies, through the advent of YouTube, are now using consumers to sell themselves products. Attention, the thing which often draws actors to the profession, has become the new commodity. Everyone is fascinated by acting. Perhaps there’s a way to share the experience.

6) What is the strangest thing that has happened to you on stage?
Mask work can be very strange and wonderful. Some of the experiences I’ve had performing in a classroom with a mask have made believe in that I’m not always the one who’s in control.

7) Who is you favourite Shakespearian character?
I wish I could be more clever then this but, off the top of my head, I’d have to say Prince Hal or Henry V. I still feel like a boy who’s misjudged, longs to grow up, get the approval of his father, have adventures and marry a French girl. (My English wife’s last name is Guy – so I’ve got that covered!)

8) Why should a young actor study the Classics?
The way I’ve studied it has given me a process that I can apply to all my work. Through that process I get to ingest the beauty of his work. You know you’ve succeeded if, through the process, you are inspired by his work. If one follows that process in all there work with the belief that that potential beauty lay there – the well will run deep. That being said, I’ve felt the well run dry at times – maybe that’s why my career has led me back to doing the Classics.

9) What plays will you be doing next season?
Will be doing The Tempest and, hopefully remount our production of Les Fourberies de Scapin/Scapin the Schemer. Plus, I’m pushing to produce a two hander that’s is made of some of Shakespeare’s greatest wooing scenes woven together with sonnets and a Christmas show, that revolves around Yorick. Yorick is the deceased court jester whose skull is exhumed by the gravedigger in Hamlet.

10) If you had a $100,000 no-strings-attached production budget, what would you do with it?
Great question – when is one given a $100,000 without strings? I’d do a simple play that I love surrounded by people I love to work with and pay them lots of money. I love Shakespeare. How about 12 actors and one director? Four five-day weeks of five hours rehearsal days (people have children and other commitments), and then perform for three weeks (reasonable) – so I guess that’s about $1,000 a week that’s… pretty good – ooops! I forgot about the designer, a stage manager, space rental, lights, set, union dues, RRSPs, box office administration. Okay, I guess that would bring us to around $600 a week for everyone. Gees, $600 a week . . . Professional Theatre’s a ball of strings.

I’d do it for free and give everyone an amazing vacation – probably in Montreal.

Now offer me a million…

What are your favourite links of 2007?

Friday, December 21st, 2007

There’s so much good stuff out there . . . we were wondering what some of your favourite websites and blogs have been in 2007. They don’t have to be theatre-related . . . but it would be great if you’d share a quick link (even to your own site).

Please paste your favourite links into the comments section below. Thanks for sharing!

The Montreal Interviews: Emma Tibaldo

Wednesday, December 19th, 2007

While our “10 questions” interview series is on its year-end hiatus, we are pleased to present a short interview series by Praxis Theatre Associate Artist Greta Papageorgiu: The Montreal Interviews. Enjoy!

1) What does Montreal mean to you?
It’s the place I grew up. It gave me a cultural identity and a view of the world that lives outside the mainstream. I see life as vulgar and beautiful. Full and empty. Exciting and horribly dull. I see the summer and the winter, the warm and the cold. All this comes from this city that embraces you with open arms and shuts you out when it feels like doing so.

2) As one of the first graduates of the National Theatre School’s directing program, how do you feel about the experience?
The program had been dormant since the mid nineties. As such, this new program was open to us as its co-creators. We had quite a say in how the program was structured and also had to navigate the territory of uncharted pedagogical terrain. It was great, exciting, at times frustrating but always challenging. I am forever thankful for the people I have met.

3) What is Playwrights’ Workshop Montreal?
It is a national new play development organization for the Canadian stage. We are a member-based organization that works with playwrights from across the country to ready new scripts for our stages. We work with emerging playwrights as well as established playwrights with programs like workshop readings, public readings, one-on-one dramaturgy, masterclass, playwright units, residencies (including Tadoussac) and production dramaturgy. We also work with theatres to disseminate the work.

4) As its new Artistic Director, what new initiatives are you hoping to bring to the company?
I’m working towards a creative centre that will allow us to push the boundaries of dramaturgy further into the multidisciplinary. We need to allow our playwrights to work with designers and other artists much earlier in the development process. I’d also like to have a much longer developmental relationship with new theatrical projects.

5) What play have you most enjoyed directing?
I’ve been fortunate enough to direct plays I really love so each has been my favourite. In terms of visual excitement I’d have to say Lifedream by Hérmenigilde Chiasson.

6) What do think is the most important thing Canadian theatre artists should be working on right now?
Metaphor and big ideas: The things the stage does best.

7) In a recent article in the Mirror you commented on the lack of works by female playwrights. Why do think that is and what should we be doing to fix the situation?
We need to be exposed to the work by women so that we grow to demand works by women. We are very conditioned by the male point of view. It is what we crave because it is what we know. We need to open our minds to the way women express their views of the world. These views are just as interesting and as profound as those expressed by men but like any artistic movement we have to be exposed to it to appreciate it. So, get the educational institutions to expand female representation in literary and drama courses. We all love Jane Austen because we all know Jane Austen, we have an appreciation for her work. Let’s raise that awareness for a multitude of other female writers. Women are just as exciting and experimental as men, really! Demand that Theatres produce more work by women and go out to see that work. Support it!

8) What do you think is unique about the Anglophone theatre community in Montreal?
Ummmm. People who live here come because they want to experience Quebecois culture. The city has two big theatrical institutions, National Theatre School and Concordia, so theatre artists come here to study and then leave to go back home or head for the big lights. The theatre community that remains struggles to find space, money and an audience. I don’t want to paint a gloomy picture because there are quite a few vibrant companies but it is a struggle. French theatre, on the other hand, has a great pool of talent, the most inventive artists work in this city, they have the structures to nurture their work if not the money. It is a great city because of the influence movement-based Quebecois theatre has on us as English language theatre artists.

9) As a director what is the strangest thing an actor has done during an audition?
Gosh, I’ve only worked with stable, committed actors.

10) If you had a $100,000 no-strings-attached production budget, what would you do with it?
Put up two plays by Montréal women playwrights.

Big gay play from small university town

Monday, December 17th, 2007
Lindsay Barton and Martin Foote.

Small town theatre artist Graeme Gerrad has gamely answered Praxis Theatre’s call for guest bloggers. In a series of posts over the next couple of months, Gerrard will be documenting the production of his company’s new play Going Back In & Getting Dragged Out – which premieres at Toronto’s Factory Theatre in January 2008.

Staging rehearsal
By Graeme Gerrard
A great deal has happened since my first post on our big gay play.

To begin, the script books have finally arrived from the printers, and I’m very happy with the results. I mean, as we currently speak there are hundreds of bound, glossy copies of my play in cardboard boxes, pushed up against the wall of my bedroom. The books are now on sale, by contacting emsdale@mac.com or by asking your local book seller for it by name.

As well, our cast of four has been rehearsing four days a week. I get such a thrill from hearing talented actors saying lines as mundane as, “Yeah, sure.” But they do, and it sounds great. Since local actors Martin Foote and Lindsay Barton, and Toronto-based comedian Pam Thomson are all so photogenic, we staged the following pictures or the cast rehearsing. (Doesn’t it actually look like they’re reheasing?)

Lindsay Barton and Pam Thomson.

The production end of things, while harder to gauge, is also coming together nicely. We now have some of the costumes, and are working on wigs and fake beards. We have a lighting design, and rented lights for Guelph. The set is also being solidified, as is the assembly of sound.

I think the real challenge for a group our size is getting the word out to people who aren’t familiar with our history in Guelph. Of course this blog helps, as will our coming interview on the University of Guelph’s radio station (CFRU 93.3 FM), and the article appearing in next month’s Off The Shelf in Guelph. But the real question is: how do people hear about the theatre they end up seeing?

I’m genuinely asking. I’d love to hear suggestions, on how to reach a young, intelligent, queer-positive theatre loving crowd.

For more information, copies of the book, or to discuss reaching an audience, write to me at emsdale@mac.com

Sometimes the weather takes centre stage

Sunday, December 16th, 2007

10 questions remixed: Unifying theories – Part I

Thursday, December 13th, 2007
David Cote

1) Do you have any unifying theories about the artist-critic relationship?
They are both in league against the idiot public and every form of authority pope, president, CEO. They just don’t know it.

Brendan Gall

2) Do you have any unifying theories when it comes to acting?
I think good stage-acting is more like good film-acting than people want to think, especially in smaller venues. Also, when you play a role I think you should use as much of yourself as possible, because you’ve had your whole life to work on the character and it’s probably going to be more interesting than a limp or a stutter. Unless you already do those things; then by all means, incorporate them.

Omie

3) Do you have any unifying theories when it comes to comedy?
I also do sketch and improv so I have seen things that can work across those types of comedy too. Two things stand out for me:

1. Be specific with detail.
2. Surprise with the obvious response.

Detail makes a scene more real to people and gets their imagination involved. People’s imaginations are funnier than you are. A really good example of this was in the movie The Aristocrats. The movie is all about a single joke. When George Carlin tells it he sets the bar with funny because he gets into such detail that you can see, smell and taste what he is talking about even though you would rather not.

Using the obvious response works well in improv and clown as you are often put on the spot to react to something that you did not expect. If you respond with the most obvious thing that character would do it makes people laugh. Sometimes they laugh because they expected and wanted the character to do that and sometimes they laugh because they did not think of it themselves but in retrospect it was obvious that that’s what the character would actually do.

4) Do you have any unifying theories when it comes to acting?
I don’t mind talking about or trying to theoretically analyze acting on my own time, but it’s way more efficient when you’re actually doing it. Amid a rehearsal process or when a film is in production, ‘theorizing’ as opposed to ‘doing’ will impede the project. In a theatre school, it’s dangerous for students to pay too much mind on theory of ‘how to act’ because when they finally get down to playing a role, their minds will be fixated on recollecting what Stanislavsky or Hagen said instead of practicing being alive in a moment. Acting is an emotional sport that needs to be practiced at all times and acknowledging your life experiences.

Josh Bloch

5) Do you have any unifying theories when it comes to art?
It’s political whether you like it or not – either you choose to challenge the status quo or you support it.

Jacob Zimmer

6) You’ve written a lot about theatre, do you have any unifying theories that have risen to the top?
Right now, “curiosity” is a key word. As long as curiosity is there I think we have a chance. Also curiously doesn’t demand a specific style, which is good, since everyone making the same work would be very boring. Also a dedication to the “same time, same place” features of live performance – that we share time and space with our audience. This, in these times of mediation, seems remarkable and perhaps a trait we should focus on and articulate.

L-R: Dusan Dukic, Martin Julien and Dragana Varagic. Photo by Cylla Tiedemann.
Martin Julien

7) Do you have any unifying theories about performance?
No. The time of the great “isms” has passed. The great 20th century art movements. The only thing that unifies performance activities is political repression, and we don’t have enough of that in our soft society. Not overtly, anyway. It’s still about the actor and the audience in real time, I guess. New media and digital experimentation – well, we’ll see. Maybe we’re in the middle of a revolution. It’s hard to know when you’re in the middle of it.

Scott Walters

8) Do you have any unifying theories about the role of formal education in shaping theatre artists?
The key word in that question, in my opinion, is “artists.” Most theatre educators, unfortunately, aren’t trying to create artists, they’re trying to create replacement parts for the current creaking theatre machine, which, as my answer to question #1 implies, is about as responsible as teaching kids how to do punchcard data entry as a means of getting a high-paying job.

Have you ever noticed that all the ads for theatre programs in American Theatre magazine brag about “training”? Training? Dogs are trained, not artists. But that should give you a clue that most theatre education is about obedience, not artistry. What’s my unifying theory? See the answer to question #3.

Simon Rice

9) Do you have any unifying theories that inform your approach to directing theatre?
Always go into rehearsal with lots of ideas and be prepared to throw them all in the trash within five minutes. Try not to work too directly towards the outcome that you desire, in fact don’t be afraid to work far off in a different direction, before slowly making your way back towards your original idea. Always be highly suspicious of something that comes very quickly and easily in rehearsal. If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.

Christopher Stanton

10) Do you have any unifying theories when it comes to directing?
It’s good not to blow all your screaming at the beginning of rehearsals. That way you still have some fury left in the bank come dress/tech day.

In real life, though – just this: Listen. There are so many forms of creation that are strong due to a single artist’s voice or vision. Theatre ain’t one of them. When I direct, I look at my role as being a co-creator, an outside eye, and a facilitator.

Theatre is Territory makes Time Out New York’s critic’s list

Wednesday, December 12th, 2007

From Time Out New York online:

“What’s the ultimate show of respect for an online critic? Our editors reveal who they themselves read.”

Check out the full list here. Thanks Time Out New York!

The future of criticism

Monday, December 10th, 2007

Here’s a great piece on the future of criticism from the good people at Time Out New York (TONY). In Bloggers vs Critics, TONY has surveyed a wide range of media critics and bloggers (including those of the theatre variety) and asked them to answer questions about the state of contemporary criticism – specifically, how it’s changing in the new media landscape.

It’s a short, sharp and insightful collection of voices.

Here’s a taste:

What basic prerequisites should all critics have to meet? How should we know whom to trust?
“A professional critic needs a deep familiarity and a passionate engagement with the subject that he or she discusses, period. That can take the form of an advanced degree in an arts specialty, but it can also result from a serious self-directed pursuit of knowledge and exposure. A careful reader can generally gauge for him or herself the level of genuine expertise that a particular critic or blogger brings to bear in his or her work; in blogging, mutual acclamation also plays a part. The recommendation of one or a few established, respected bloggers can go a very long way in welcoming another voice into the ongoing discussion. Voices we trust help to guide us to new voices that we learn to trust.
– Steve Smith
editor, music blog Night After Night

Check out the full piece here.

Tonight!

Monday, December 10th, 2007

Please join Praxis Theatre for the second in its series of original play readings. This month, we are pleased to present Matthew Gormans If You Could Be Anything (Youd Be Disappointed).

WHAT: Reading of Matthew Gormans
If You Could Be Anything (Youd Be Disappointed)

WHEN:
Monday, December 10 @ 8 pm

WHERE: The Concord Café - 937 Bloor St. West
(Just West of Ossington subway station on the south side)

CAST: Riley Gilchrist, Greta Papageorgiu, Shaun McComb

For more information, please contact Laura Nordin.

Praxis Theatre’s definitive guide to prescriptive theatre lists

Friday, December 7th, 2007

Have you ever wondered what theatre would be like if there was a simple rulebook to follow? A set of irrefutable laws that would – when followed to the letter – empower you to produce consistent, high-quality theatre?

Man. It would be great to have a list like that.

Well we have some exciting news for you. We’ve scoured the Internet and are pleased to present you with Praxis Theatre’s definitive guide to prescriptive theatre lists.

Here is everything you’re ever going to need:

First, you should definitely look at Matthew Freeman’s Rules for the writing of plays – all 20 of ’em. This is basically everything you’ll ever need to know about writing a play.

Then, go to Crow’s Encounters10 rules to enjoying theatre. Let’s face it, we can all do better at enjoying theatre, right? So here are the ways to do it. Awesome!

Pan Theatre presents The Rules of Improve. There are 20 of them spread across Part I and Part II. These are good.

The Times Online has Born to run and run – 10 rules for making money on Broadway. Our last Broadway production (The Chainsmoker Diaries) didn’t do so well. That will never happen again thanks to this indispensable list!

Finally, The NeoFuturists offer Greg Allen’s 25 rules for creating good theatre. These are pretty incredible – and so TRUE.


OK. This is a pretty definitive list, but we’ve probably missed a couple. So please feel free to pipe in. Anyone out there know of any other theatre lists we can add to our collection?

What should we talk about now?

Wednesday, December 5th, 2007

Any suggestions?