Theatre is Territory

Archive for January, 2008

Play reading roundup

Thursday, January 31st, 2008

Two cool-sounding play readings coming up:


1) Tonight @ 8pm @ The Tarragon Theatre’s Near Studio

Best/Before Theatre is reading Natalia Goodwin’s There You Go And Here You Are – directed and dramaturged by Cole J. Alvis.

Cast: Carrie Hage, Brandon Thomas, Assumpta Michaels, Nadiya Chettiar, Ryan G. Hinds and William Poulin.

Click here for more info on this reading.


2) Monday, February 4 @ 8pm @ The Concord Café

Please join Praxis Theatre for the next entry in our series of original play readings. This month, we are pleased to present Taylor Sutherland’s The Sand Factory.

Cast: Shaun McComb, Greta Papageorgiu, Ross McKie, Justin Friesen, Cayle Chernin.All are welcome.

For more information, please contact Laura Nordin.


What a great way to spent a couple of wintery nights in Toronto. Hope to see you there!

The Montreal Interviews: Eric Amber

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008

The final entry in our Montreal-focused interview series by Praxis Theatre Associate Artist Greta Papageorgiu.

1) What does Montreal mean to you?
Montreal is a living city. An old piece of the new world. I love its history and share a bit of its heartbreak. Its multicultural diversity, European flavour and Canadian lifestyle makes Montreal one of the best cities in the world.

2) How did you end up moving to Montreal and building Theatre Ste. Catherine with your bare hands?
On a cold winter night there was a fire that destroyed the building. As there had been no insurance it sat in near complete disuse until such time as I happened to inherit. I was on a tight budget, so the demolition and rebuilding took five years.

3) Your free improv classes have a huge following among the actors here in Montreal. How did they come about?
They’re free so . . . that’s cool and of course they are a lot of fun, but mostly because there is a skill to improv that can be observed and crafted.

4) How did Keith Johnstone and the Loose Moose Theatre in Calgary influence your approach to theatre?
The magic is in the method and the depth of understanding. Improvisation is not comedy. Improvisation is a philosophy that can unlock your mind and imagination. At a point we learned that I didn’t even need a theatre and performed to people on streets and outdoor festivals all over the world.

5) What are TheatreSports?
Theatre Sports is team on team competitive improv. First created in Calgary at the Loose Moose Theatre, TheatreSports and improv comedy is now popular all over the world as direct result of Keith Johnstone’s work and forms the basis of similar improv groups such as Canadian Improv Games and League National D’ Improvisation.

6) Can you teach someone to be funny?
Define funny.

7) Any words of wisdom from your twelve years as a street performer?
A smile goes a long, long way.

8) What advice do you have for someone just starting to run an independent theatre space?
Get some friends.

9) Where would you like to see Theatre Ste. Catherine in 25 years?
Still open and teaching a whole new generation of people.

10) If you had a million dollar no-strings-attached production budget, what would you do with it?
Hmm…I have to keep some secrets.

Can we talk about your theatre company’s website?

Monday, January 28th, 2008

We’re currently working on a redesign of our website, and we were wondering if we could ask you a few questions about your own company’s website. Any feedback would be most appreciated.

Here are our questions:

  • Of all the features on your company’s website, which is the most useful to you and why?
  • What features does your site currently lack that you wish it had?
  • How do you feel about the idea of advertising on your website?
  • Do you have any other thoughts on what makes a good independent theatre website?

Thanks a lot for your help.

10 questions: Mallory Gilbert

Friday, January 25th, 2008

1) What the fuck is going on?
Change is happening – as usual. We’re getting caught up in religious wars. Desperation has made huge numbers of people turn away from reason toward blind faith. Because they can’t solve the problems that face them in the present, they’re turning back the clock. Pretty soon, we’ll have the crusades all over again. Words have taken on new meanings. Who used the word terrorist 10 years ago? When did liberal and feminist become dirty words? Now that we have the chance to communicate across the world, we’re forgetting how to use the language.

So, maybe that’s the perspective of someone “over 50” but it saddens me. On the other hand, at least in the arts, I see incredible energy and a growing awareness that we have a responsibility to talk about what the fuck is going on.

2) What does it mean to you to become a member of the Order of Canada for “contributions to the success of Toronto’s Tarragon Theatre, and for helping to foster a vibrant national theatre scene?
Becoming a member of the Order of Canada happens to other people; it never occurred to me that it would happen to me. The fact that I knew some of the people who were members was enough. I pinch myself and, of course, like everyone else (of a certain age) who has received an honour, I wish my parents were around to witness it. “See, dad, even in the arts, you can be acknowledged.”

Working at Tarragon has been almost a total joy. I consider myself to be extremely fortunate to have worked so long at a theatre that has maintained its fundamental focus even as it grew and adapted to the changes going on around it. Luck has a lot to do with it and maybe an ability to see a good thing when it’s placed in your path. When I started at Tarragon – in 1972 – professional theatre as we know it today was still a work-in-progress. Just by being a part of it, you were “helping to foster a vibrant national theatre scene.”

3) What is one of your fondest memories of your time at the Tarragon?
There are so many fond memories and so many great productions. But, because it was produced over a longer period of time, I’ll say The Donnelly’s Trilogy. It was collaborative theatre at its finest, with a poet for a playwright (James Reaney) and a perfectionist for a director (Keith Turnbull) and a collection of dedicated artists. It was also the seventies and you worked hard and played hard. It was a fantastic experience.

4) Do you have any unifying theories that inform your approach to theatre management?
Not really. Openness, collaboration, honesty (in budgeting and reporting), promptness (with artists, agents and funders), think before you speak (especially if you intend to say no).

5) How important is it for smaller, independent theatre companies (without permanent spaces) to have a General Manager?
I think small companies can ride out the first couple of years on passion and enthusiasm and then, reality hits and no one finds administration fun anymore. That’s when you need a GM or a bookkeeper, or an eager and talented person who is willing to learn on the job.

6) When you look at the varied landscape of Canadian theate, what kinds of stories do contemporary artists seem to consistently neglect telling?
A couple of years ago, I would have said that we weren’t taking a political stand on anything, but that’s changed. There are now a number of companies/artists talking about the big world issues. There’s room for more. Now we have to tackle some of the issues closer to home. In Toronto, we could start with city hall politics, the perceived violence in the schools, the growth of ethnic villages within the city, Toronto’s role in the country.

7) Do you think conservative, right-wing politics are somehow fundamentally at odds with the arts community?
Yes, absolutely.

8) Who are some of your favourite Canadian arts administrators?
Nancy Webster, Jane Marsland, Colleen Blake, Peter Zednik, Cherry Karpyshin, for starters and I know there are many more.

9) How important is it for younger members of the theatre community to establish a mentorship with a senior-level peer in their field?
Very important. It’s just as important for a senior-level artist/administrator to establish a relationship with younger members of the theatre community. We teach (in the broad sense of that word) each other. The exchange is what’s important and everyone comes away from a good relationship with some new knowledge and excitement about what they’re trying to achieve.

10) If you could change just one thing about theatre in Canada, what would it be?
Can’t stop at one.

No more apologizing (internally or externally) for being Canadian. ALL of our critics would feel passionately about the theatre, care about the future of the arts, be knowledgeable about the arts and have a talent for the written word. No more *** in print. We would have an abundance of excellent directors. More playwrights would experiment with style; more playwrights would tackle political topics. More people would take a chance on live theatre and love it.

The importance of costume design in independent theatre

Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008

“Costume design is important because it immediately supports the characters in the story being told. It helps an actor find his/her character. And when it comes right down to it, if the actors are not believable as their characters then the audience won’t suspend their disbelief. No matter the production, I personally believe design, all design, should be one of the first things to be considered. The design of a production supports the story and the visual story should mold seamlessly together with the action. This overall vision for the piece, in my opinion, should be the very first thing to be considered.”

– Sabrina Evertt
Artistic producer of Vancouver’s
Twenty-Something Theatre

Well said. Read Simon Ogden’s full interview with Everett at The Next Stage theatre blog.

Out and about

Tuesday, January 22nd, 2008
Toronto-based actor Beatriz Yuste
spotted here leaving Swan Restaurant.
Yuste then hailed a cab.


Spotted any hot theatre talent out and about
in your neighbourhood?
Send us your starstruck theatre photos:
celebrity@praxistheatre.com

Support Local Artists Working

Monday, January 21st, 2008

Over at the Theatre Ideas blog, Scott Walters has created an intriguing new project called Support Local Artists Working (SLAW). In Walters’ words, here’s what the project is about:

  • The Goal: to increase the hiring of local talent by major regional theatres.
  • The Pay-Off: Increased employment for local artists, increased ticket sales for the major regional theatres.
  • The Justification: Audiences like to follow the development of local artists.

Sounds like a wonderful idea and a great example of turning theatre ideas into action.

Check out, for example, his idea for the “RIP protest” – whereby local audiences protest the import of a non-local, big city actor by ripping their bio out of the program and leaving it on the floor of the theatre.

If you’re in a regional theatre situation that’s suffering from big city brain drain (and its blowback), this could be just the spark to set a new theatre revolution alight in your town.

Take a look at the introductory post here, and then skip on over to the new website Walters has set up to keep track of the action, here.

10 questions: Don Hall

Friday, January 18th, 2008

1) What the fuck is going on?
Oil production has peaked while the consuming of it increases so future generations are fucked; the President of the United States couldn’t beat me in a game of Scrabble; the WGA is on strike so there will soon be nothing but Who Wants to Give a Rich Guy a Handjob? and Project Air Traffic Controller and America’s Next Top CPA on the air; someone, somewhere, is adapting a Paulie Shore film into a Broadway musical and I want them hurt; and the population is in a constant state of fear-motivated consumerism.

On a personal level, I have a day job that I completely dig, my wife is a sexy genius, and I’m physically in better shape than I’ve been in since college. So, apart from the planet going straight to hell in the fast lane, life is Disco.

2) How do you feel about Chicago’s contemporary theatre scene?
I have mixed feelings about our scene.

On the “Glass is Half Empty” side, the municipality is embracing the Broadway “Big, Splashy, and Kind of Stupid” model in efforts to boost tourism at the expense of the Off-Loop scene that is the heart of Chicago Theater. The theory from some is like Reaganomics – if people come to see Wicked and Jersey Boys then they’ll get a taste for theater and some will naturally trickle down to patronize the smaller, smarter artists. Like Reaganomics, that’s just a bunch of wishful horseshit.

The reality is that the City spends millions on the downtown structures and ignores any physical plant needs of the vast, overpopulated non-Equity scene and that scene has to keep moving further and further from the geographic center of what folks consider “Chicago.” On top of that, the City continues to underfund arts education and, as a result, the arts are not a regular part of most kids’ daily life. They then fund theater companies who spend much of their creative energies replacing the basic arts educational programs with often sub-par plays and hokey performances by groups who, in the large part, aren’t representative of the quality of work to be found in the city.

And, whether our city wants to admit it or not, Chicago is a fucking “Sports & Bar” Town. Theater is a once-a-year treat because you gotta spend those bucks on getting shit-faced and puking at a Cubs game.

On the “Glass is Half Full of Rosy Liquid” side, while we have far too many wannabe artists in the city, we likewise have a higher-than-average brilliance quotient – playwrights churning out superior work every day, some of the best actors, improvisers, stand ups, sketch comedians, and musicians on the planet are honing their crafts right here in Chi-town.

With a constant stream of mid-sized festivals (The Rhino Fest, the Around the Coyote) and large showcase festivals (Chicago Sketchfest, Bailiwick Director’s Festival) combined with the relative ease of putting up a show anywhere and a (unfortunately dwindling) history of excellent theater journalism, Chicago may not have replaced New York as the theater capital, but we’ve narrowed the gap considerably.

3) Why do you identify your skin colour in the name of your blog: An Angry White Guy in Chicago?
There are two answers to that one.

First, years ago, I created a show (that Jen directed) called An Angry White Guy Reads the Paper. In essence, it was a combination of an Armando Diaz long-form and The Living Newspaper of David Shepherd.

I was a character (the AWG) who came out on his porch to get his Chicago Sun-Times and have a beer and a smoke before going to work at the scotch tape factory. The audience was my illiterate neighbor, Phil. I would read random items from the paper to Phil, rant and rave about the state of the world and then an ensemble of six improvisers would riff off of my vitriol. We went back and forth like this for an hour. It was a blast and we had a pretty decent following of regulars come week after week. When I started my blog, it seemed natural to use that character as a launching point.

Second, the image of an angry, white American male is steeped in the stereotype of the hyper-conservative, NASCAR-loving, redneck gun-lover. I like tricking those guys into coming over to my blog and being surprised by my leftist, artsy point of view. I’ve received a fair number of hate emails because of that.

Also, I don’t think there is anything wrong with identifying your race. I’ve been accused of being racist for simply pointing out that I’m white, which is plainly stupid. Racism is the belief that other races are inferior in some way – stating my own race isn’t pejorative to anyone.

4) What are you angry about?
Stupid. Stupid makes me angry.

Voting for a president who you’d like to have a beer with? Stupid.

Banning smoking because Communism fell and we all needed another enemy is stupid.

Dumbing down our educational system by making it more about taking tests than learning and then complaining about how thuggish, drunk and vapid kids are is stupid.

Legally Blond The Musical? – stupid.

Doing NOTHING about Global Warming? Myopic and stupid.

Not impeaching our corrupt Executive Branch but investigating Baseball? S-T-U-P-I-D.

Defining basic sadness as clinical depression in order to boost anti-depressant sales – stupid AND corrupt.

There’s a lot of stupid out there. All you have to do is open your eyes and be amazed.

5) How do you feel about the idea that American theatre has – to its detriment – become centralized around New York City?
It’s always been centralized around NYC – that has never really been to our detriment. NYC is a great town with great artists. The focus on bigger and bigger houses, more and more money, has done the damage and NYC is also the capital of “Selling your Mother for the Highest Price” as well.

Broadway is a bloated, celebrity-driven whore overtaken by Disney and Sony. Somewhere along the line, the money-lenders realized that if you dressed up a high-concept turd with enough flash and dazzle, enough stage gimmickry and had a Hollywood star perform in it, they could make the fast turnaround buck. NYC has given birth to so many good things for American Theater but the good things are now being over-shadowed by the money-grubbing greed factories looking to shill the tourists. When the accountants become the producers and the artists, in a drive to create “mass art,” write plays that are increasingly less complex but highly entertaining, the art as a whole suffers.

The truly unfortunate thing is that it works and everybody wants to get some of that golden pie. So you get Cirque du Soliel in Vegas and Broadway in Chicago and the Guthrie “Megaplex.” The big glitzy horseshit that passes as theater in these monstrously large organizations obliterates the new and the original. When originality is stomped on and buried, the outlook gets pretty grim for all but the hacks responsible for “destination shows.”

It is easy, however, to throw blame at the snake-oil salesman of Broadway and thus paint all of New York with that broad brush. New York has a rich history of great theater and deservedly so. There are also scores of New York artists that are not a part of that system, churning out countless plays and musicals that don’t buy into the corporate model of Deadly Theater. Most importantly, New York has a culture of theatergoers – it is a part of the population’s regular list of “Things to Do” and that can’t be said of most places west of the Apple.

6) How have your experiences as a theatre blogger influenced your ideas about theatre?
The experiment that began as my blog was mostly to give myself a reason to write every day. I tried the private journal route but I found I needed a sense of urgency and obligation to write as well as I could AND to generate things to write about that were more interesting than my daily grind. So, I started the blog.

Since then I have opened up a world for me that was surprising – I correspond (in one form or another) with theater cats from all over the globe and get some insight into what’s going on artistically in regions thousands of miles away.

As for how it has influenced me – it has given me the opportunity to try out some of my underlying ideals on the computer screen and get feedback from those who are either getting ready to walk the same walk as I, are currently on the same road, or have been where I’m at and have insight to where I’m going. That sense of universality and community is invaluable. I can’t say that it has changed much of my own artistic output, but it has made me a bit less knee-jerk when contemplating something I’m involved in.

7) What kinds of stories does American theatre seem to consistently neglect telling?
Stories that legitimately reflect the lives of every day people.

Why is Law & Order so fucking popular? I think it is because it reflects the things that are happening around us every day. Documentaries have exploded in recent years. Why? Because they address the things right in front of our faces. The Office is so compelling because it pretty accurately reflects the people in our lives (and is blisteringly, painfully funny).

Theater is mired in history and fantasy and the stories of the elite and the downtrodden but rarely deal with meat and potatoes life. Where are the Clifford Odets of today? In this way, Scott Walters has it right in that the only characters we see that hail from Middle America and the South are either spoofed yokels, noble savants amidst the close-minded townfolk, or serial killers. Where are our John Steinbecks?

8) What are some of the more common marketing and PR mistakes you see being made by other theatre makers in Chicago?
I’d say the most common mistake is using the existing corporate model as a basis for which to operate. That model was created 50 or 60 years ago and is in big trouble. Cookie cutter marketing is lost in the shuffle – to effectively market something within the din of advertising and promotional noise, you gotta do something out of the ordinary or be relegated to “one more fucking thing being sold to me.”

Think big, think creative, think about *almost* breaking the law to get the information to the people you want in your audience. Specify and conquer. Anything less is just tepid noise that will promptly be ignored.

9) Why is Michael Moore a true American hero?
Whether you like his methods or not, Moore uses the nominal pulpit he has to champion those who have no voice. He speaks the truth as he sees it and, in doing so, attempts to shed light on our decaying and near-dead Democratic Experiment in hopes of reversing the cancer of complacency and self-interest that fuels our apocalypse. And he almost single-handedly reinvented the documentary film genre to meet the demands of the YouTube generation - you think we’d be seeing Alberto Gonzalez heckled online or The Daily Show without Roger & Me?

10) As a writer, what are you better at now than you were when you were younger?
Believe it or not, I think more before I commit something to screen or paper. I’m also a bit more skeptical of my own bias when launching a diatribe.

A new blog

Thursday, January 17th, 2008

Toronto-based humans and theatre makers Ian Mackenzie and Simon Rice (both of Praxis Theatre) have started a new blog called The New Optimist.

What’s it about? Good question. Check it out and see.

The blog’s editorial department also includes Vancouver-based playwright Simon Ogden and Dubai-based photo-journalist Megan Hirons.

Apparently, everyone has agreed to swear a lot in their posts. So that should be good.

Check it out here.

10 First Nations comedians

Monday, January 14th, 2008

Here’s a quick follow-up to a discussion that’s happening in the comments section of our interview with Ryan McMahon. For your reference, a list of 10 contemporary First Nations comedians (provided by Mr. McMahon, and in no particular order):

  1. Don Kelly
  2. Don Burnstick
  3. Gerry Barrett
  4. Charlie Hill
  5. James & Ernie
  6. Jim Ruel
  7. Craig Lauzon
  8. Mark Yaffee
  9. Drew Lacapa
  10. Ryan McMahon

That’d be one hell of a ticket!

10 questions: Ryan McMahon

Friday, January 11th, 2008

1) What the fuck is going on?
Not too fucking much, you?

2) How have you developed as an Artisitic Director since starting MooseGuts Theatre in 2003?
I think my vision is very different than it was. I started the company five years ago, with the dream of producing ‘ground breaking spectacle theatre’ that featured Native performers, directors, technicians, etc. That vision changed to wanting to do guerrilla theatre/performance art so that I could show ‘the man’ exactly what I thought of him. Right now the vision sits somewhere in between. Right now MooseGuts Theatre Company is more of a production company than anything. MGT is just me right now. I have chosen to not register as a non-profit, and I am going to go with more of a traditional business model for the company.

When I open my doors to the MGT Company’s home, it will be a black box space with workshop/rehearsal space, an office, and working bathrooms. I want MGT to more about the work than the space. I don’t want to be a landlord to my own company, I want to be an artist. So, for now, MGT is all about the youth training I do, the small, local comedy shows I put on, and the writing/performance I do. The vision is very fluid and will always change – I think.

3) What is Improv Boot Camp?
The IBC is a model for Oshki-Biimaataziwin (the Good Life). The Improv Boot Camp is a training program that I have worked on for a number of years to empower, challenge, and engage youth in their communities. When I graduated from theatre school I started teaching youth theatre workshops around the Toronto area and more often than not they would be an afternoon long, or at best, a day long and that was simply not enough time to work with the kids. Couple that with my utter distain of our “Indian Celebrities” that charge communities huge cash for “empowerment and leadership” workshops and I knew that I had to develop something that could and would make a difference in young peoples lives.

The workshop itself is a mixture of Augusto Boal, Viola Spolin, Keith Johnstone, and generic theatre school exercises mixed with Anishinaabe cultural teachings and world views, Anishinaabe singing and dancing teachings, and a deeper look at how young people impact their communities. The IBC is all about re-connecting youth with their communities in a real, tangible way by using theatre as empowerment.

4) How would you characterize Winnipeg’s theatre scene?
Safe. Grossly safe – if grossly safe is even a real term used by humans.

5) How does your background in standup comedy inform your approach to making theatre?
I think it’s the other way around for me – my background in theatre informs the way I approach doing comedy. I’ve only been doing standup comedy for two years and in that two years I’ve achieved some amazing things. People in Winnipeg see me as a ‘guy just starting out doing standup’ and not a lot of people here in Winnipeg realize that I’ve been working as an actor/director/writer/improviser/sketch performer for 10 years now. People see me as a ‘comedian’ now because I get so much work doing comedy, whether performing or writing, but I’ve trained in theatre for a long time and that truly is where my heart is.

I still write plays, read plays for people, dramaturge, etc. but I’m not out there chasing theatre work. When I was in Toronto auditioning for stuff, chasing whatever my agent sent me, I was never brown enough for casting people, and never white enough for casting people. I vowed early not be ‘the Indian’ and so I stopped caring about ‘being an actor’. I was always writing, so, it was a natural thing to start producing my own shows, speaking with my own voice on stage, and essentially begin my path of being more of an ‘alternative theatre/comedy/performance artist guy’ rather than try to fit into a mold I simply couldn’t fit in.

My performance goal is to examine and deconstruct everything that pisses me off, write some funny shit about it that doesn’t come off as vitriol, and somehow add some multimedia elements to it (puppets, video, masks, sound, movement, etc.). People see me as an alternative comic because I treat my act as theatre in terms of how I present the shit I write/perform, and to me, it’s all part of the same thing – letting the shit out of my head.

6) From your experience working with First Nations Elders, have you noticed anything particular about they way they approach comedy?
Honestly that changes in every community. Some people believe you shouldn’t tell stories in the summer (traditionally a time for work), so they refuse to hire a comedian (storyteller) for their events. It is different everywhere. A lot of the people I run into on my travels tell me how refreshing it is to hear from “my generation” in a funny way.

In general, there are 10 working Native Comedians in North America. Native Comedy is not even in its infancy yet, and that is very clear to me based on reactions/responses I get after I do my act. One young guy in Alberta told me I was like the “Indian Chris Rock” and I guess I was flattered. My elders have always told me to be myself, to not lie. It’s my personal belief that that is where comedy comes from – truth. There are still a lot of taboo things that we, as Native Peoples, don’t talk about. Those are things I take aim at right away. NOT JUST to talk about them, but, to show our old people that we’re going to be okay. I want them to believe that, to know that, and to trust that.

In general, Native people love to laugh – laughter is medicine is an old cliche thrown around the teepee a lot, so, more often than not, the places I play too have already been sharing food, company, and laughter before I even step on stage. It is hard for me though, obviously looking at me – I look more cowboy than Indian. The first 10 minutes of my act is getting them to believe I’m an Indian. When I do mainstream shows, I have to do an entirely different act – I’m too white to be their Indian, and too brown to be their funny white man. I’ve learned that I need to be funny no matter who I’m playing for.

7) What’s funny?
The truth.

8) How much of your work is informed by a sense of anger?
All of it. Every last consonant and mother-fucking vowel bleeds anger. Every shitty fucking sound cue and half-assed piece of shit lighting change in my shows are chosen while very angry. All the fucking posters and handbills and shitty little websites I make on my stupid fucking MacBook are all pieces of shit but apparently necessary to promote the dumb fucking shows I have chosen to . . .

9) What is your fondest memory of being on stage?
My favourite memory of being onstage would have to be bombing at the Upright Citizens Brigade Theatre in New York City during the Del Close Marathon in 2003. The marathon itself is the ‘big show’ of improv and I was there with my troupe, Tonto’s Nephews.

Leading up to the festival we had been getting some interest from CBC and the Winnipeg Comedy Festival, as well as some other television development stuff. The fact that we were an all-Aboriginal Comedy Troupe was appealing apparently and there had been talk that some NBC Diversity people were going to be watching us at the festival to see what the hype was about.

To make a very long, boring story short, we went and we sucked. We had an amazing time slot, the theatre was full,

“. . . in the first row of the audience sat
half of the cast of
Saturday Night Live.”

and in the first row of the audience sat half of the cast of Saturday Night Live. We went out there and made ourselves look like fools. No one was listening onstage, two of our ‘stars’ bullied and trudged their way through their storylines, and the whole show crumbled – it was 30 minutes of shitty improv. I don’t even remember if we got any laughs.

When I got off the stage, I went straight to the back of the room, and by chance I ran into Horatio Sanz. He knew I was steaming mad about being bullied off stage during the improv set and he pulled me aside and for about an hour he told my what he liked about my style, we talked improv and where it’s going, and we teased a bunch of drunk UCB ‘chicks’, or, ‘groupies’, and it was an incredible time.

Sucking that badly onstage at such a huge comedy festival was a humbling performance moment for me. Everything I had worked for to get to that day exploded in my face. After I left the theatre I went for a walk to Central Park, sat under a tree, and started to think about what would become MooseGuts Theatre.

10) Any tips for non-comedians on how to be funnier, generally?
My general advice is to not be funny. Some of my best comedy coaches/directors have told me time and time again when you try to be funny, you’re probably going for a gag (cheap joke/laugh) and when going for the gag you take yourself out of the scene, or the moment. A lot of players/actors that don’t know what improv/sketch/standup is about – their instincts immediately take them to the gag. However, an attentive audience is usually in the moment as well, so when a player goes for the gag – the audience should either groan loudly at you or throw shit at you. It’s cheap.

The best way to get laughs (if that is your goal) is to be yourself. Stay open physically (body and voice), spiritually, and emotionally and your truth will always come out on stage. Truth in comedy, follow the fear because that is where the laughs are.

Wednesday theatrosphere roundup

Wednesday, January 9th, 2008

The Next Stage
Have you been following Vancouver-based playwright Simon Ogden’s 11-question interview series? You can’t go wrong reading the entire set here, but if you’re looking for a place to start, check out his interviews with:

Theatre Ideas
Theatre activator-engineer Scott Walters is back from his period of self-imposed radio silence. Check out OK, Here’s the Problem, in which he continues to clean the grit out of the ever-creaking theatre machine. Walters makes the theatrosphere a more exciting place to be. Period.

The Mission Paradox
To get your arts marketing fix, you can’t go wrong at Chicago-based Adam Thurman’s The Mission Paradox. Check out this recent post in which he introduces an intriguing equation: New company + new play = Bad idea.

Big gay play from small university town

Tuesday, January 8th, 2008
Graeme Gerrard takes to Toronto’s gay village in drag to promote his new play.

Small town theatre artist Graeme Gerrad has gamely answered Praxis Theatre’s call for guest bloggers. In a series of posts, Gerrard has been documenting the production of his company’s new play Going Back In & Getting Dragged Out – which premieres at Toronto’s Factory Theatre this January.

Finding audiences is a real drag
By Graeme Gerrard
Going Back In & Getting Dragged Out opens in less than two weeks. We’ve resumed rehearsals since our holiday break to the expected hazards of the occasional forgotten line, but the cast has really gelled in terms of chemistry.

Although rehearsals had been on temporary hiatus, the promotion of the play and distribution of the book has not slowed down at all. I’m happy to say the book is now available in Toronto at both Theatre Books (11 St. Thomas Street) and This Ain’t The Rosedale Library (483 Church Street).

In order to promote the play, my assistant director, Cody Rus, and I hit the gay village this weekend to spread the word in drag.

We offered people the chance to win a copy of the play by putting on some of our drag queen costumery. Some scoffed. Others were already putting on the faux-fur. What’s even more exciting is we’ll be back next weekend for more town-crying.

For more opportunities to win, tune in to Proud FM (103.9) afternoons on the week of January 7th for a chance to win your tickets to the Factory Studio performances of Going Back In & Getting Dragged Out.

In the mean time there still is the matter of getting the play on its feet.

Great women-focused theatre

Monday, January 7th, 2008

Theatre Revolve has one of the coolest, most info-packed websites going. It’s local and women-focused:

“Theatre Revolve empowers young women through the creation of live theatre, artistic training, mentorship and leadership development in dynamic projects of immediate impact and global implication, while establishing and strengthening local and international arts networks.”

Check out the site here.

10 questions: Alison Croggon

Friday, January 4th, 2008

1) What the fuck is going on?
I’ve stopped for the year (it’s summer holidays here), so as far as I’m concerned, a wonderful lot of nothing. Except that I’m a bit obsessed with translating Beowulf.

2) What’s the best thing about being a theatre critic for The Australian newspaper?
What’s brilliant is that it allows me to straddle mainstream and alternative worlds (my favourite position – one of my mottos is that a moving target is harder to hit). When I was asked to be Melbourne theatre critic, I was very anxious that it not affect the blog, which is my first priority; if it had meant that I had to change my modus operandi, I would have declined the position. But The Australian was very accommodating.

The Australian is the only national daily newspaper here. I like working for them. They have all the usual print limitations – not enough space and not enough money – but they are the only print arts section I’ve worked for (and here in Australia, because of the concentrated media ownership, I’ve worked for practically everybody) that always consults you about cutting your copy. And where the arts editor is actually interested in art.

It’s also a bit of a return to my beginnings for me, because I started off my professional life as a journalist on daily papers.

3) Ideally, what would you like theatre artists to get out of your reviews of their work?
On the blog, which is where I do what I consider my “real” reviews, my main aim is simply to provide a response. I.e.: “I was there, and this is what I experienced and what I thought.” Whether that’s useful I guess really depends on the artist involved: I am one member of an audience, and that may be handy or not. I hope that my response is useful in the way that good conversation is useful. Especially in the case of artists whose work I admire, I hope my responses are encouraging and interesting.

Also, I do provide a record of an ephemeral event, which in the end is perhaps the most useful thing I do.

4) How do you navigate the tricky political waters of being a theatre critic and a theatre maker in the same city?
I don’t make theatre. I have in the past, but that hasn’t been the case for several years, and never when I was working as a theatre critic. Over the past few years I’ve been mainly writing poems and fantasy novels. I don’t have a problem with knowing and speaking to theatre artists (I’m even married to one), and friendship has never been a barrier to honesty for me. (My friends are all very patient people.) But I think it would be ethically dodgy territory to, say, offer someone a text, and then head off to review their shows. It would put the artists themselves in a difficult position, and would be difficult to handle my end. I know earlier Melbourne mainstream print critics have done just that, and I always thought it was a bit suss.

Mind you, such ethical difficulties don’t pertain in the literary world, where novelists review novelists and poets review poets all the time.

5) When you look at the landscape of contemporary Australian theatre, how much of it seems to be built on (or make explicit reference to) the country’s Aboriginal performance traditions?
Not much. There are some excellent Indigenous theatre companies and artists: Stephen Page’s Bangarra Dance Theatre is probably the best known internationally, and there is a strong contemporary tradition of Indigenous theatre, with shining talents like the director and playwright Wesley Enoch. But it doesn’t integrate with the mainstream theatre conventions as much as you might expect.

Why that is so is extremely vexed. Some of it is about the understandable sensitivity Indigenous people feel about cultural appropriation, and the reluctance of white artists to step on those sensitivities. To say this is a complex area is somewhat understating it…!

6) How have your experiences as a theatre blogger influenced your ideas about theatre?
I think seeing and writing pretty well constantly about theatre for almost four years has simply allowed me to evolve my ideas. I’m not sure that my basic feelings about art have changed much since I first started thinking about it; but blogging has exposed me to a lot of work that has made me challenge or refine or extend my thoughts. Which might well have been – for me, anyway – the best thing about it.

7) What does feminism mean to you?
Feminism is the real F-word. Women tend to deny they’re feminists, it has had a lot of bad press. I think that’s a shame. Like those who oppose racism, feminists simply protest against the idea that a certain class of human beings is less than fully human.

I became a full-on feminist after I had my first baby. As a young woman I was free to choose my behaviour, free to pursue a career, free to be what I liked. As a young mother I hit the social machinery head-on, and that’s when I began to understand how women were forced into limiting roles by virtue of their sex alone. Motherhood is the mother of all roles, and I refused point blank to conform to any of them. I was what is known as a “bad mother”. (You can imagine that my high achieving children cause me considerable private pleasure, in the light of the dire predictions made when they were younger.)

Feminism is the recognition that women have the right not to be considered inferior just because they were born female. It doesn’t imply any sort of superiority. The thing is that there are many kinds of feminism, it’s hardly a singular entity. I get impatient with some kinds of feminism, especially the single-issue-type that ignores factors like class and race. I don’t like the victim mentality that goes with some strands, and I do get tired when it seems that feminism always seems about beginning again from the basics, as if it’s one of the outer circles of hell. But, sadly, I do think it’s as necessary as it ever was.

8) What’s the most memorable complaint about one of your reviews you’ve ever come across?
I can’t remember!!

One nice thing about doing the blog is that I haven’t had much hate mail. When I was theatre critic for The Bulletin (a national weekly magazine, our version of Time) in the early 1990s, I got mail that had to be opened with asbestos gloves. Maybe I’ve mellowed, though I do think the culture has changed since then. I was sued once over a review. That was pretty memorable.

9) How does your background in poetry inform your approach to making theatre?
It’s profoundly important, though in ways that are hard to track. I am sometimes criticised for being too word-centric as a critic. I’ll admit that one, though I don’t see anything wrong with it. I think words are important, and are as important in theatre as any other aspect of the art.

I think probably the most important thing is that years of writing poetry means I have a finely attuned ear, especially for rhythm. I suspect that a lot of how I experience and respond to theatre is predicated on its rhythmic structures.

10) As a writer, what are you better at now than you were when you were younger?
I don’t make so many embarrassing mistakes as I did when I was younger. Or at least, I don’t make the same mistakes. That’s about it, really. Writing is always about starting at the beginning, and that means that you never actually know what you’re doing. I used to think that one day I would grow up and everything would be clear at last: I still remember when it dawned on me that growing older just meant that I was more aware of my ignorance. I have often thought of consciousness as a light spreading over a dark sea: the wider the light grows, the more it reveals the depths beneath.

But on the other hand, if I wasn’t learning all the time, writing would be a very dull way to spend my life.