Theatre is Territory

Posts Tagged ‘Theatre quotes’

Not just for laughs

Thursday, August 16th, 2007

“After a close examination of the existing literature on performance art, it is remarkable to see how much of the emphasis has been placed on the grim, the intense, and the masochistic. Indeed, performance audiences have come to expect to be shocked, to witness artists being covered with bodily fluids, pierced, hung, confined, and/or mutilated. Transgressive, taboo expression gets the lion’s share of attention from both the press and the academy, and fuels both the curiosity and outrage of the public . . .

“The images of women’s performances from the 70s, in particular, which have received the most attention in art history are those of women stuffed, bound, and naked. One cannot deny the power of these images. Ana Mendieta’s raped and bloodied body, Adrian Piper’s stuffed mouth, Angelika Festa’s bound body, or Gina Pane’s scarred body are images that still have the potential to provoke strong reactions . . .

“Is the legacy of performance art as austere body art – a medium that canonizes self-inflicted pain – so all encompassing that there is no room for other strategies? Where are the strong, positive, celebratory images of women in performance art history? I do not intend to disavow the extreme work wholesale; rather, I hope to demonstrate how humour is as serious a performance strategy, and that those artists who employed it in the 70s and early 80s were not held in as high esteem as those who performed trauma.”

– Tanya Mars
Caught in the act: an anthology of performance art
by Canadian Women

A defense of the elitist theatre critic

Tuesday, June 19th, 2007

Amicus Plato, sed magis amica veritas: I cannot serve the cause of friendliness when I am trying to serve the cause of theatre by being as passionate, subjective and truthfull as I can be.

“Criticism is, by definition, one of the most elitist activities extant. It is highly presumptuous to sit in judgment – to be paid for sitting in judgment – over other people’s work and talent; to pronounce, in a democratic society, on what is superior and what inferior, and know, even while doing it, that masses of people will not understand such discrimination, feel threatened by it, and resent it bitterly.

“The only kind of critic who is not considered an elitist at all is one who likes most things; the trouble with such a critic is that he is not a critic at all. To be choosy, to be stern, is to be elitist; yet what is discrimination and tough-mindedness except strong conviction based on intense comparative evaluation, which might just as easily be called practical, shrewd and energetic. In his own domain, a critic is simply a rugged individualist; what makes him an elitist would, in almost any other field make him a good American.”

– John Simon
Uneasy Stages, 1973

How to write a sentence

Wednesday, April 25th, 2007

For me, a play is a form of writing which isn’t complete until it is interpreted by actors. But it’s still a form of writing. And so most of my time is spent thinking about how to write a sentence.

Wallace Shawn

The actor’s deepest calling

Wednesday, April 4th, 2007

Theatre – through the actor’s technique, his art in which the living organism strives for higher motives – provides an opportunity for what could be called integration, the discarding of masks, the revealing of the real substance: a totality of physical and mental reactions.

This opportunity must be treated in a disciplined manner, with a full awareness of the responsibilities it involves. Here we can see the theatre’s therapeutic function for people in our present day civilization. It is true that the actor accomplishes this act, but he can only do so through an encounter with the spectator – intimately, visibly, not hiding behind a cameraman, wardrobe mistress, stage designer or make-up girl – in direct confrontation with him, and somehow instead ofhim.

The actor’s act – discarding half measures, revealing, opening up, emerging from himself as opposed to closing up – is an invitation to the spectator. This act could be compared to an act of the most deeply rooted, genuine love between two human beings – this is just a comparison since we can only refer to this emergence from oneself through analogy. This act, paradoxical and borderline, we call a total act. In our opinion it epitomizes the actor’s deepest calling.

Jerzy Grotowski
Towards a Poor Theatre, 1968

A cheap trick of unhappy people

Wednesday, February 28th, 2007

“If you decide to be an actor, stick to your decision. The folks you meet in supposed positions of authority – critics, teachers, casting directors – will, in the main, be your intellectual and moral inferiors. They will lack your imagination, which is why they became bureaucrats rather than artists; and they lack your fortitude, having elected institutional support over a life of self reliance. They spend their lives learning lessons very different from the ones you learn, and many or most of them will envy you and this envy will express itself as contempt. It’s a cheap trick of unhappy people, and if you understand it for what it is, you need not adopt or be overly saddened by their view of you. It is the view of folks on the verandah talking about the lazy slaves. There is nothing contemptible in the effort to learn and to practice the art of the actor – irrespective of the success of such efforts – and anyone who suggests there is, who tries to control through scorn, contempt, condescension, and supposed (though undemonstrated) superior knowledge is a shameful exploiter.”

– David Mamet
True and False: Heresy and Common Sense For The Actor, 1997