Theatre is Territory

Archive for November, 2007

New Vancouver theatre

Friday, November 30th, 2007
If you’re in Vancouver this weekend . . .
Click here for more info on this play.

Big gay play from small university town

Tuesday, November 27th, 2007

Small town theatre artist Graeme Gerrad has gamely answered Praxis Theatre’s call for guest bloggers. In a series of posts over the next couple of months, Gerrard will be documenting the production of his company’s new play Going Back In & Getting Dragged Out – which premieres at Toronto’s Factory Theatre in January 2008.

The production diary starts here
By Graeme Gerrard

I guess I enjoy sitting and staring blankly at my computer screen, because, yes, I have decided to attempt to write a blog during the process of producing my next play.

I suppose I should start by explaining who I am. I’m basically a small town guy, coming from Emsdale. If you look it up you’ll find that it truly is a one-horse town, especially now that the highway has bypassed it.

I studied theatre at the University of Guelph and when I graduated I decided that I wouldn’t follow most of my fellow students to Toronto, but I would remain in Guelph, which – while no Emsdale – is certainly manageable to someone like myself, who admittedly has trouble with crowds.

In 2004 Pam Thomson, a recent fellow graduate of the University of Guelph, decided to produce Going Back In at Guelph, Ontario’s eBar, where she worked. It was a play I had written three years earlier while in university, produced during the winter break, and Pam had liked it.

Guelph-based theatre maker Pam Thomson.

Pam’s production of Going Back In was a success, and plans were made to follow it up with another. The result took Pam up on stage, and put me in a writer/director roll, for 2005’s Some Play.

Some Play poster.

Pam and I moved away, I came back a year later, and it took a while to mount the next production, but this April’s The Hardly Boys: My Brother’s First Time was our company’s first venture without Pam, and our first production brought to Toronto.

With each subsequent production I’ve attempted to add a new challenge. Bringing The Hardly Boys play to Buddies In Bad Times Cabaret was an extension of that.

Remounting the old
When I wrote Going Back In I had always intended to write more for the characters – in the form of a second act. I took a few stabs at it, as early as 2003, with little success. Eventually, in the year I lived away from Guelph, I wrote a second act, and called it Getting Dragged Out, which, I feel, complements the original nicely.

Going Back In is a story of a gay undergraduate showing up at his sister’s house for dinner with a date. This night however his date is a woman that he has tricked into believing he’s straight. Or has he?

The second act, Getting Dragged Out, is about the same brother and sister duo, but is more a discussion about drag and issues of identity. Both are a mixture of silliness and serious discussion.

I decided with this production our new challenge would be to publish the play. Some people call it vanity press, others consider self-publishing to have a respectable history. I choose to think of it in its best light, and decided it would be a good way to get my words into as many minds as possible.

So that’s how this production begins. Calls were made, emails written. I assembled a cast and crew, booked the Factory Theatre Studio and Guelph’s eBar, contacted a graphic designer to create a poster and cover image, set a performance and rehearsal schedule, and begun the arduous task of getting the word out.

I’m also happy to say that GBI & GDO will once again feature Pam Thomson and an amazing cast of University of Guelph alumni.

Putting the script in print
Self-publishing a play isn’t the most difficult thing in the world, but if it’s your first time, it’s got some challenges. I knew about getting an ISBN number, a process that is incredibly easy, but I didn’t, until the eleventh hour, know about the CIP data. The CIP data is the cataloguing in publication data which you see at the bottom of the publication information page, and it’s basically a tool for sorting books. The process of getting this number was also surprisingly easy, requiring a bunch of information about the book and copy of the title page.

Jay Dart is a great designer and really handy with his computer. His assistance with the assembly of the book, cover and back-cover design were instrumental and basically the only reason it is actually happening.

He has done the poster design for all of the productions Pam and I have done at Guelph’s eBar. I love seeing another artists representation of what I’ve written. It amazes me every time; how a single image can capture an element of the plot, or a moment, or whatever, and create intrigue of it’s own. I love it.

Well, I’m getting tired of looking at this computer screen, at least it isn’t blank any longer. I am excited though, about this project developing, and about writing about it. So, if the play, or book of Going Back In & Getting Dragged Out has you interested, check out this blog in the coming weeks, or feel free to contact me by email.

iPhone targets theatre artists

Monday, November 26th, 2007

Apple’s new iPhone is going to make you a better theatre artist. No kidding. Check out the new iPod TV commercial featuring Off-Off Broadway director Ken Davenport.

(Thanks to Slay at Theatreforté for the heads up.)

10 questions: d’bi young anitafrika

Friday, November 23rd, 2007

1) What the fuck is going on?
life in 3s. I turn 30 in december. I have a 3-year-old son. I have my 3rd book (rivers and other blackness between us) coming out before my birthday. finishing up a trilogy of plays (3 faces of mudgu sankofa – last play is a commission from soulpepper, a dub opera called word! sound! powah!). I am currently resting my soul in akra ghana. everything about my life is changing. I am deeply content.

2) How does your background in dub poetry inform your approach to writing for theatre?
dub is rooted in oral storytelling tradishuns that enslaved afrikan peoples brought to the americas. the main elements of dub are 1. language 2. political content (simply meaning ‘of the people’) 3. musicality 4. orality. when I write for theatre, these are the elements that make up my foundation, therefore my work is rooted in issues that concern the many communities that I belong to as a womban, as an afrikan, a mother, as an artist, as a queer-identified person, as a working person, an able-bodied person, etc. engaging the audience is essential in communicating the story with them so it permeates the head and eventually rests in the heart. music and rhythm and humour and honesty are good for that. the elements that I use to engage the audience as a dub poet are the same elements I use to engage the audience as a playwright. 


3) How have you developed as an artist since joining the Soulpepper Theatre Academy as artist-in-residence?
the biggest lesson I learnt was how to sit still and listen. how to be disciplined and listen. how to be in a group and listen. listening, I have realized is one of our most integritous revolushunary tools and if your aim in life is to be a part of inevitable social change then listening is one of the biggest assets you can have. during my time in the academy I learnt both to listen to the community we created there and to listen to myself.

4) How well are Black Canadians being served by and represented in contemporary Canadian theatre?
what is contemporary theatre? If you mean the mainly publicly funded, mainly media supported, medium-to-large theatre houses, clearly there are not many black people (meaning womben and men, however womben especially), or first nations people or many other people of colour or differently abled people). the reason for this is clear – longstanding legacies of colonialism and imperialism (racism, sexism, classism, etc) dating back to the very stealing of canada from first nations people.

that being said, my own understanding of contemporary theatre is theatre that is being created now, today, which is happening all over; which does get some media support. If this is what you mean then I definitely feel that black canadians are both being served and represented because we are creating our own theatre and have been since we have been in canada, both as enslaved afrikans brought over on ships and as new immigrants choosing to come here voluntarily.

I am becoming less pre-occupied with being served by the former definition of ‘contemporary canadian theatre’ and more concerned with creating it. I feel that that is one of the solutions I can offer. therefore I feel that indeed in creating the stories that I am telling, I am serving canadians and am representing myself.

a major part of the reality is that as human beings we seldom relinquish power or share it simply because that is the ‘right’ thing to do. usually something has to be at stake or a gain on the part of the power-holder has to be identified. for me this has always meant removing myself from scenarios that may compromise my ability to have power over myself. Self-determination is essential in identity, self-esteem and community building.

I feel that as people in general we are responsible for telling our own stories and creating the means by which to tell them. there are some serious concerns around funding and access, however like I said these will not disappear over night so what do we do in the mean time? wait? no. we create. we live. we dialogue. we change ourselves and our families and our lovers and our friends. and we do not give up our power over self by waiting for power holders to share power. we simply create another reality in which we can find self-empowerment and positive self-reflection and collective dialoguing about change; tell our own stories. I am also less concerned about having these dialogues in the vacuum of acting/writing for theatre and more concerned with having them across broad socio-political-economic circles because these systems are old and entrenched so changing them needs a complex inter-connected circular approach.

5) How important is it for artists to be actively challenging systems of oppression with their work?
artists are responsible for honouring the sacred in our present-day societies. people and our livelihoods are sacred. I feel that if the work we create is truly for the people then we can’t avoid asking questions about our present state of being (globally, nationally, locally, personally). No-one likes to be hurt, left out, disregarded, disrespected, used, abused, not celebrated, etc. being loved, admired, celebrated, challenged, inspired, having food, a roof, safety, etc. that shit feels good. so if this is true, and we look around at our world, it’s inevitable that some serious questions will be asked. the artist decides what questions, what style to ask the questions in, what characters through, etc. but the questions will be posed and maybe even some answers. this is largely how I choose as an artist to get involved in challenging systems of oppreshun. however it is crucial that I enjoy my life; my own happiness and the work that I do go hand in hand. I do not enjoy working in an environment that does not help me to feel inspired and to feel that life is worth living, so this kind of work needs to stoke the fire of life and for me, it does that.

6) How much of your work is informed by a sense of anger?
anger is very important in my work, especially when it can be transformed into inspiration. anger is an emotion that can tell you when a situation is very wrong and if channeled carefully can lead to some amazing questions. for my own process, anger has always been a gem. in my most angered moments I have learnt so much about myself, so much about the ways in which I am growing and all the room I have left to grow. I have also learnt about my ability to be courageous in the face of ostracization. mostly, when I have looked deeply at my anger I have realized that it masked a deeper hurt and pain. so my anger has also taught me about my humanity. and in turn about other people’s humanity. as artists it is also our business to deeply investigate the ways people’s humanities (womb)manifest. I use anger in my work both to inform characters and to inform subject matter.

7) What is your fondest memory of being on stage?
at 13 I was cast as one of the soldiers in kamau braithwaithe’s adaptation of antigone titled odale’s choice. about 2 weeks into the rehearsal process I was recast as odale (antigone). I remember praying over my brother’s dead body on the mountain-side and trying so hard to do him justice, do the performance justice, and also to project my voice for the thousands of Jamaican secondary-school-aged children in the audience. I ended up screaming and loosing my voice. that was the happiest moment of my childhood life. It’s when I knew I was to be a storyteller.

8) What does the word “womban” mean to you?
we are all from the womb of someone. me too, I am from the womb of my mother and I never want to forget that. as opposed to the creation myth of being from the rib of someone.

9) If you could change just one thing about theatre in Canada, what would it be?
the proscenium box stage approach with the ever-present fourth wall. we’d all do it in the round or do it in the triangular with the tip to the audience, like the passe muraille stage we used for blood.claat. that was a brilliant and poetic concept. and we’d have to acknowledge the audience at some point during the story. maybe this approach could be a constant reminder that theatre is storytelling for and about the people. us.

10) What can North American theatre makers learn from the way artists are working in Ghana?
one of the adinkra symbols from ghana is called sankofa, which translates to ‘return and get it’ or ‘learn from the past’. for us as canadian theatre makers, to move into the future we must learn from the past. there are some dialogues we need to have about canada’s past that we are unwilling to have. but if we don’t have them how can we hope to do different, do better for our children’s future and the seven generashuns to come?

What the fuck is going on?

Thursday, November 22nd, 2007

The tyranny of questions
By Ian Mackenzie

On this Friday, November 23, we will publish here the 50th in our “10 questions” interview series. That’s 500 questions and 500 responses from 50 of North America’s finest contemporary theatre makers.

Since starting this project back in October, 2006, I’ve often thought that when we got here, to our 50th, I’d take a few weeks off from conducting interviews to take stock of the series. Of course, 50 is an arbitrary number, and I’m not entirely sure what form this “taking of stock” will take. But I do know one thing: it will inevitably involve the asking of more questions.

Questions beget questions
Looking back on the 49 interviews we’ve published so far, I am left with many more questions than I started with. I wonder about the questions themselves. Have I asked the right ones? Have I asked them to the right people? Have any unifying theories risen to the fore? And is it my job to search for and re-present any such unifying theories?

Or, worse, has the tyranny of the questions themselves prevented deeper truths from emerging? Do interviewees ever feel bullied by these questions or by the format itself? And what kind of assumptions do these questions contain? Are they sexist? Racist? Classist? Ageist?

And why do I get to be the one to ask the questions? What if my questions are bad? Or stupid? Or – even worse – expose some otherwise-hidden prejudice – a naiveté that belies an unflattering presumption on my part?

Feel free to reject the terms of the question
The good news is that none of this really matters to the people on the other end of the interview – the 50 amazing theatre makers who’ve taken the time and care to share their ideas with us on this blog. Each of these 50 interview subjects has, in their own way, transcended the tyranny of the questions. And for that I am grateful.

Maybe that’s what I love most about the “10 questions” format: it affords the asker the liberty of ignorance – permission to not know the answers, and even, to a degree, to not know the right questions.

So let’s see what happens with this taking of stock. It will probably involve some remixing of these 50 interviews. And a rethinking on my part of what it means to ask a question. After all, what is a question. Really? What is its purpose? And how do we know which questions to ask?

In the mean time, I encourage you to revisit the 49 interviews we’ve published so far. I believe they contain an uncommon wealth of insight, humour, grace and intelligence – all of it theatre-related. All of it shared with us free of charge, generously and in the best spirit of community.

As for this Friday’s interview – number 50 in the series – I think you’ll find it to be a most fitting denouement. It introduces ideas and language that I feel will become important as this series moves forward and onwards to its (again arbitrary) 100-interview milestone.

And, as always, any feedback or suggestions for improvement are most appreciated.

SUPERnatural in Toronto

Wednesday, November 21st, 2007
A new workshop production written by
Michael Wheeler and the Toronto Youth Theatre senior cast.

Directed by Michael Wheeler.

Click here for tickets and more info.

10 questions: Chris Abraham

Monday, November 19th, 2007

1) What the fuck is going on?
I have no idea, I’m too busy rehearsing.

2) Why is Crow’s Theatre’s upcoming play called Eternal Hydra?
It is the title of a lost manuscript by a lesser known modernist named Gordias Carbunkle.

3) Does the play arrive at any conclusions about the nature of recorded human history?
It does reflect on the ways in which power, class and race influence the way stories are created and then make their way in the world.

4) What does post-modernism mean to you?
Revealing the sometimes-hidden content in form and vice-versa.

5) Since joining Crow’s Theatre as Artistic Director in June 2007, what have been some your biggest challenges with the company?
There are no challenges. It’s incredibly easy.

6) Are there any overarching themes or ideas that are common to the work being presented in Crow’s Theatre’s current season?
They’re all stories about identity, conscience and the struggle to be a grown up in the world.

7) What’s the secret behind the success of your ongoing collaboration with Anton Piatigorsky?
Our shared interests, our friendship and our ability to challenge each other.

8) How much of your work is informed by a sense of anger?
None.

9) How do you feel about celebrity culture and its relationship to the craft of acting?
I don’t really spend any time thinking about that specific relationship.

10) Do you have any unifying theories that inform your approach to directing theatre?
I like things to feel really real.

The Rice Report returns

Friday, November 16th, 2007

Good news
Praxis Theatre Co-Artistic Director Simon Rice has resurrected his widely beloved U.S. politics journal The Rice Report.

A Rice Report primer
The Rice Report started back in 2004 – a reaction to Simons growing distress with the state of American politics and its questionable foreign policies. His Rice Report newsletter series used the 2004 U.S. presidential election as a springboard to foster rigorous (and informed) discussion of an increasingly compromised democratic process.

His weekly reports became wildly popular among a small group of followers – and included a live play-by-play “performance” of the controversial Kerry-Bush showdown on election night: Tuesday, November 11, 2004.

A new blog
We are thrilled to welcome Mr. Rice to the blogosphere and announce the return of The Rice Report. Among the topics hes promising will be in the cards:

Who’s running? From Hilary to Huckabee, the A-Z on 2008!
2004 Aftermath Was the general election stolen?
The Hidden History of 9/11 A weekly crash course for beginners and/or skeptics.

And if you’re wondering what any of this has to do with theatre, check Simon’s response to one of our 10 questions:

6) How has your interest in American politics influenced your ideas about theatre?
American politics have all the great elements of drama – farce, tragedy, absurdity, heroes, villains, clowns – the stakes are always high and although much focus has been put on the circus-like atmosphere of modern American politics, we all want to know what the next Act will bring. The Bush administration has felt like the usurping power in one of Shakespeare’s histories. With Donald “Rummy” Rumsfeld emerging as chief rhetorician, uttering such poetic lines as, “The absence of evidence, is not evidence of absence,” when no WMDs were found in Iraq. That’s a beautiful line!

I guess what I’m saying is that my passion for American politics deepens my understanding of theatre, and vice-versa.


Click here to get to The Rice Report, then hit Bookmark” on your browser. You’ll be glad you did.

Opens today in Toronto

Wednesday, November 14th, 2007
At Toronto’s Tarragon Theatre.
Click through for more info and box office.

Out and about

Monday, November 12th, 2007
Donna-Michelle St. Bernard and Catherine Hernandez
(both of Native Earth Performing Arts)
seen here leaving their offices in Torontos Distillery District.
The pair were seen later in the day shopping at
Torontos upscale MarieJosette wearable art boutique.



Spotted any hot theatre talent out and about
in your neighbourhood?
Send us your starstruck theatre photos:
celebrity@praxistheatre.com

10 questions: Allan Teichman

Friday, November 9th, 2007

1) What the fuck is going on?
Life.

2) How did you make the transition from being a Stage Manager at the Shaw Festival to being the President of the Canadian Actors’ Equity Association (CAEA)?
I haven’t. I’m still a Stage Manager at the Shaw Festival. Being President is not a paid position in the same way that staff positions are paid.

It’s actually not much of stretch, when you think of it. The President is the Stage Manager of Council, not “in charge” of Equity. That is Council’s job, as a body. I make certain that Council has what it needs in order to do its governance work effectively, efficiently and creatively. Sound familiar?

3) Do you feel that the CAEA is currently living up to the spirit of its mandate?
For Council, that is the most important question of all.

Our mandate comes from the owners of Equity: its members. The mandate is not a static thing. Theatre changes, the world changes, and members’ needs change. The only way for us to keep on top of a living mandate is to regularly consult with the members.

To that end, we have just concluded a major survey of our membership. This will tell us what our mandate is going forward, how we are living up to it so far, and what we need to do to improve.

Although complete results are not in yet, what we have seen so far suggests that we are living up to our mandate in the areas that the members commonly regard as the most important. Beyond that, they would like us to improve in providing some of the “soft” benefits of membership, such as advocacy, advice, and various resources. Please be aware that I have just condensed 1,500 pages of results into two sentences. It is a much, much more detailed picture than that.

4) What do you see as the single-largest benefit of being a member of the CAEA?
This, too, was part of the survey. Preliminary results suggest that the highest-ranked benefits are:

Excellent working conditions; enforceable contracts; protection from abuse; regular, secured payment; fees no less than scale.

Personally, I don’t think there is any point in choosing just one. Many of them are tightly interwoven. We did an exercise in advance of the survey, where we asked four focus groups of randomly chosen members to start discarding benefits, beginning with those least important to them. It wasn’t too difficult at first, but it invariably got to a point where there were 6-8 benefits left – beyond that, it was very challenging for the focus groups to choose which were expendable.

5) What are some of the common contract-related mistakes being made by CAEA members?
I don’t deal with member contracts on that level, so I’ve turned to staff for some assistance on this.

The most common contract-related mistake is that quite often members have not familiarized themselves with the agreement or policy in which they are being engaged, prior to signing the contract. As a result, they are sometimes taken aback by the termination provisions under the agreement, or by other contractual obligations to the engager.

6) Do you have any unifying theories about labour unions and their relationship to the arts?
Your timing is impeccable. I just got back from a conference of the Fédération Internationale des Acteurs. Meeting with artist union representatives from a dozen countries, I realized how different artists’ needs are. There are actors across Europe struggling to retain employee status as we fight to retain independent contractor status, and there are theatre artists in other parts of the world who only dream of the kind of problems we in Canada worry about.

So, my unified theory is that the union is there to support the artists – to find out what their group needs are, and to assist them in achieving them.

7) What can independent theatre companies do to better inform themselves about CAEA-related matters?
Call one of our business reps. They are the expert source.

8) Any tips for how cash-poor theatre companies can make sure they are compensating their creative talent fairly?
I’m not the right person to be giving advice to cash-poor anything, and I have never run a theatre company.

9) If you could change one thing about the performing arts in Canada, what would it be?
30 million people would have the idea, at least once per year, to go see a show. Perhaps not all on the same day, though.

10) What do you know about stage management now that you wish you knew when you were younger?
Not what to do, but what to not do.

The Master doesn’t talk, he acts, and when his work is done, the people say, “Amazing: we did it all by ourselves!”
– Tao Te Ching, C. 17

Chicago playwright Rob Kozlowski is funny as hell

Thursday, November 8th, 2007

Want proof?

Read his blog post on theatre’s Donation season – a scathing and hilarious “how-to” guide for setting up your theatre company’s donor program. A sample:

“In the donor list you eventually publish in some manner, just stick a couple of Anonymouses in the list, especially in the higher tiers, just to impress people that your theater is so dangerous and cutting-edge that people will give you money anonymously.”

Then flip over to his post called Play readings:

“One of the foibles of new plays, of course, is that while plenty of playwrights get world premieres, it’s that second production of a play that is most elusive.”

And these are just from today’s posts. Basically, you can’t go wrong checking Kozlowski’s blog every day. Especially on Fridays.

Who should get the $100,000 Premier’s Award for Excellence in the Arts?

Monday, November 5th, 2007

The good people at the TAPA blog are spreading the word about the Ontario-based Premier’s Award for Excellence in the Arts. Good idea! Here are the grants on offer:

Artist Award: One recipient will receive a prize of $35,000. The recipient will nominate a promising new or emerging talent in the same field. The new or emerging talent will receive a prize of $15,000.

Arts Organization Award: One recipient will receive a prize of $50,000.

All five short-listed finalists – in both categories – receive $2,000 each.

Check here for full details. What Ontario-based theatre people or groups should we nominate?

10 questions: David Oiye

Friday, November 2nd, 2007

1) What the fuck is going on?
So much is going on that it’s hard to know where to begin. ArtHouse Cabaret just closed and in three days we’ve turned around the space to put up Hysteria, Canada’s largest multi-disciplinary festival of women’s work. Our Queer Youth Program is going gangbusters. And we’re reading Rhubarb submissions. And I just got back from two weeks in Japan. (Oh, and my whole house needs a general clean . . .)

2) How have you developed as an Artistic Director since first joining Buddies in Bad Times Theatre in 1999?
I came to Buddies as pretty much a neophyte, having run only one company before, and that (Cahoots Theatre Projects) was a much smaller organization and only for two years. So the learning curve has been tremendous since I got here. The company itself has grown and shifted, most notably from our focus on script and play development towards supporting the creation and presentation of more form-based theatre. My development continues as I work to catch up my training with the current trends in theatre, away from scene- and character-driven drama, and more towards a looser depiction of what theatre and theatre creation might be.

3) Are there any overarching themes or ideas that are common to the work being presented in Buddies’ current season?
I think there are themes of interactivity and interfacing that pervade works like Gay4Pay, Art Fag and The Beauty Salon, and notions of playfulness that permeate all of the work that Buddies is producing within the season. We jokingly called it our “playful, play-less” season. We’re forcing the audience to re-evaluate how they perceive theatre, and we want to make it an enjoyable experience.

4) Do you ever feel restricted by Buddies’ mandate of promoting queer Canadian culture?
We have turned what some might perceive as a restricting label into something much more liberating by approaching the term queer as two-pronged. As such, we’re pursuing work which is queer in an LGBT sense, but also queer as in work of challenge, which counters mainstream habits and conceptions.

5) How well are queer Canadians being served by and represented in contemporary Canadian theatre?
I think LGBT Canadians have a fair amount of representation in contemporary Canadian theatre. Most mainstream theatre companies will include at least one show within their season that features an LGBT character or theme. Many LGBT playwrights are being produced by major companies. That being said, I think a lot of LGBT work gets “whitewashed” as it goes through a process of dramaturgy, direction and presentation in the hands of non-LGBT artists. Queer work, on the other hand – alternative work that challenges the norm – is often still marginalized by the larger companies, often out of a fear of disturbing their crucial subscriber base.

6) What qualities do you look for when committing to the development of an emerging artist?
For me personally, I look for someone who has something different to say and can articulate what it is they are striving towards. I look for someone who is at a point where interactions with other artists or with dramaturgy or direction are welcome and not struggled with. And finally I look for originality in ideas, in voice, and in presentation.

7) At the independent theatre level, what should members of a theatre company expect from an Artistic Director?
If you are referring to members of a theatre company and their own AD it is difficult for me to answer since Buddies is not an ensemble company. We bring creative members on in a show-by-show basis. If you are referring to the broader sense of what should independent theatre artists expect from the AD of a company like Buddies, I think they should expect to be seen, and listened to. Their ideas heard, if not acted upon. And I think they should expect an element of leadership in that theatre’s involvement in the community. But they should also expect that each company has a focus that is more specific than the breadth of their mandate, and although their idea may fit the mandate, they should expect that it does not always fit the company. (I’m not sure I got that one right . . .)

8) What can theatre makers learn from cabaret that they might not get from other forms of theatre?
I think one of the great things about cabaret is the versatility that can be presented within a single program. How often do we go to the theatre for an exciting evening, only to be disappointed by the same “flavour” all the way through? I also think one of the great advantages of cabaret is the ability to more easily extract what doesn’t fit or doesn’t work. Wouldn’t it be great to be able to simply lift out that scene or that character that just doesn’t work in a drama?

9) If you could change one thing about theatre in Toronto, what would it be?
I think I would want to shake up the audiences. And the theatres for that matter. To both be more challenging of each other.

10) What is ArtSexy?
ArtSexy is an attitude. It’s a state of mind. It’s a sexy new website for Buddies in Bad Times Theatre.